legitimate criticisms of feminism:
-transmisogyny and the lack of inclusion of transwomen
-the racist history behind it and the lack of inclusion of woc
-ignoring and invalidating women with disabilities
-pretty much anything that falls under lack of intersectionality
-internalized misogyny and girl hate
-promotion of political lesbianism
-radscum
illegitimate criticisms of feminism:
-a feminist was really mean to me once
-they’re sexist against men
(Source: ihaveabsolutelynoidea)
Sunrise on the east side
Want to wake up next to you
But I’m dreaming on the west side
Trying to find my way to you
Hearing Aid Ear Plugs Concept by designaffairs
Rising self-confidence is taking prostheses to another level. People don’t try to hide their handicap anymore.Show what you‘ve got, don’t make a fuzz about your problem. Wear your hearing aid like a piece of jewelry, a stylish accessory. Be individual, be cool, be yourself.
Hearing aid is made for customers with a medium level of hearing disability. In case of a severe hearing damage one could order the PLUG which contents a more powerful system.
This is nuts
MC LOOK
I mean, I don’t know how you feel about earlobe plugs and these are pretty huge, but it’s really neat to see that they’re making hearing aids that are fashion statements, too
I don’t really care about earlobe plugs one way or the other, although these do look kinda cool. I dunno though - I’ve always made my hearing aid a fashion statement just by the colours I pick out, haha.
NOTE TO EVERYONE: DISABLED PEOPLE HAVE SEX! - By, S.E. Smith
So I’m heading down to Los Angeles this week to give a talk at the University of Southern California1. For some reason, when I tell people I’m giving a talk, the thought of standing in my mighty presence and hearing my dulcet tones live isn’t enough. They want to know what the talk’s going to be about. Do you think people ask Barack Obama what he’s planning on talking about when he invites them as his personal guests? I think not.
So, in this particular case, I say I’m talking about the desexualisation of people with disabilities. This party trick is best performed live, because you get to witness the blank stare you get in response. On the Internet, I have to imagine it.
“The what?” people ask.
“You know,” I say, waving my hands around and undermining my assertion that I’m a great public speaker. “Like, the common belief that people with disabilities aren’t sexual?”
“Oh,” some of them say, still looking confused.
Or “ah,” some of them say. That one’s usually followed with “but wait,aren’t you asexual?”
Well, yes, but I am still pretty up on the whole sex thing, believe it or not.
Here’s a thing about people with disabilities: We have sex. Well, some of us, anyway. Yet, there’s a really common belief that we don’t, or that we can’t, and there are all kinds of things bound up in that idea. Some people think we’re innocent and pure and sweet and incapable of sexuality. Others think that there are physical barriers to sexuality when you’re disabled; as “Downton Abbey” so kindly recently reminded us, if you have a spinal cord injury, you can’t have sex, right?
And there are all kinds of consequences to this really common social attitude, like the fact that disability often isn’t included in sexual education, because why educate people who won’t be having sex? And that because people assume we don’t have sex, it’s much harder to report sexual assault and rape — and, incidentally, people with disabilities are more likely to experience sexual assault and rape.
We also tend to get left out of sexytimes discussions, because, well, we don’t have sex, right? So why bother? You don’t see articles with sex tips for quads2 or how to use tickling play in a relationship with someone who has limited sensation on parts of her body, or who has sensory sensitivity and chronic pain. Sex shops rarely offer disability-oriented classes. The Liberator markets itself as a prop for a better sex experience — but it’s also used by people with physical disabilities.
This is what I mean by “desexualization,” that society strips us of any identity as sexual beings by assuming we are not sexually active.
Some people with disabilities like to say that we have sex just like nondisabled people, but that’s not quite an avenue I like to pursue either. Because, the fact of the matter is that some of us don’t have sex like nondisabled people do. And that’s not really a problem or something we need to hide. We’re all grownups here, we can handle teh sexorz and the fact that it comes in many flavors, yes?
I don’t want to brag on my fellow crips or nothin’, but some of us haveway better sex than nondisabled people. Hate to break it to you, but them’s the facts. Physical disability not only doesn’t prevent people from gettin’ it on, it can become an integral part of the sexual experience. We sometimes have very different sex that is hot and awesome in ways nondisabled people can’t even imagine or comprehend; this idea that our bodies are repulsive means that people can’t wrap their heads around the idea of sexual disabled bodies.
One of my favorite Pride signs ever is “trached3 dykes can eat pussy for hours and never have to come up for air.” Beat that. I double dog dare you.
There’s sometimes this hurry to reassure nondisabled people that we’re “just like you,” to norm our bodies and lives, and sometimes I think this is a mistake. The body is an integral part of sexuality, and obviously variations are going to play into how you express yourself sexually. There are, for example, many interesting things a lesbian amputee can do with her stump, you know? For people with hand tremors, those tremors can become part of their sexuality and may be integral to sex for their partners. There are a lot of fun things you can do in, around and with a wheelchair. The list goes on…
Partners of people with physical disabilities who are nondisabled or who don’t have physical disabilities are often subjected to sharp, invasive questioning about their sex lives. People never seem to take “I’m totally satisfied by my awesome sex life, how about you?” as an answer because the idea of a crip having sex is so alien, so frightening, so odd. There’s always that lingering sense of “ew, who would have sex with a disabled person” thing going on.
The fact is that a lot of people want to have sex with disabled people, because people in general like having sex, and sometimes partners have (or acquire) disabilities. And some of us can do things with our bodies that you cannot— — just like some of you can do things with your bodies that we cannot. Disabled sexuality comes in a broad spectrum just like nondisabled sexuality, but I assure you, it definitely exists. To act otherwise is to pretend that roughly 20 percent of the population doesn’t get it on, which is clearly just not realistic at all.
Now that we’ve got that straightened out, can women’s magazines please start including disabled sex tips? Because honestly, all the nondisabled ones are really boring. Some of us can do cool bendy things! Let’s talk about that.
1. Wasn’t that subtle? The talk’s on Thursday the 22nd at 8pm in WPH207. The venue is accessible and sign language interpretation will be provided. So tell your friends. Incidentally, anyone who sees me wandering helplessly around the USC campus at 8:05 PM on Thursday the 22nd, could you kindly direct me towards WPH207? Return
2. Some quadriplegic people refer to themselves as quads because, you know. Return
3. A trach is a tube inserted into an artificial hole in the trachea for the purpose of providing respiratory support. Return
I really wanna get some colored tubes for my hearing aid/earmold….!!!!
WHOA!! thats awesome! i want!
Yeah, I need some new ones….maybe next time I’m in I’ll ask about this! I might get colored molds too, since it’s been years since I’ve done that…
DUDE! If I’m going to wear those uncomfortable things, I sure as hell want them to be pimped out! /WANT
THESE ARE AWESOME
I want the red one because my next hearing aid will most likely be gold
Peter Allen - Not The Boy Next Door
“Though I may look the same way to you
Underneath there is somebody new”
Here’s a friendly reminder:
-You cannot be sexist toward men. Sexism is based on a system of oppression. You CAN be discriminatory, rude, inconsiderate, and/or prejudiced against men but you CANNOT be sexist toward them.
-You cannot be racist towards white people. Racism is based on a system of oppression. You CAN be discriminatory, rude, inconsiderate, and/or prejudiced against white people but you CANNOT be racist toward them.
This is not difficult.
morerobots replied to your post: transableism is privileged, ableist bullshit
I forever hate tumblr for making me aware of this concept. I wish I could bleach it out of my head.Yeah, likewise? I didn’t even know it existed before it was mentioned on tumblr and then I think my head just fucking exploded.
I hate the belabored comparisons by transabled tumblrs to transgender rights, because forced gender roles and having a gender identity disaprate with that assigned-at-birth is entirely the same thing as being able-bodied but “identifying” as disabled.
Disability isn’t an identity like that. It’s directly related to the model of impairment. This isn’t to say that everyone who is “disabled” is impaired, but it’s a social element that exists in an active or reactive manner. Considered even the Deaf community, who do not identify as disabled. They’re still acting within the means of the thesis of physical “impairment” meeting the antithesis of sociolinguistic mitigation to form that synthesis of absolution: the outright denial of disability and the assumption instead of a cultural identity. The Deaf have the right to that identity. Just the same, those identifying as hard-of-hearing have the right to reject the label of hearing impairment and the negative denotations of such for a neutral term with postive connotations.
However, the able-bodied do not have the right to the identity of “disabled”, either through self-identification or social assignation. They lack any element of the identity, in being entirely able-bodied. Disability does not work like gender, there is not an able-disabled binary, there is a distinct difference. Transableists try to apply a lateral difference when it lies entirely in a vertical plane. The perception of the able-bodied as “better” and “more capable” than the disabled, and the application of the impairment model as diminishing. There is no scale, you cannot be “interdisability”, and the rejection of the label of disabled is not because you believe your problems are falsely assigned, but because you accept your identity and don’t view it as disabling. That is an action of empowerment, of defiance of the oppression of the able-bodied. The same as the acceptance of disability in identity and refusing to be viewed as impaired or invalid even as you internalize that societal label in terms of the dichotomy of oppression and marginalization.
The able-bodied assuming the identity of a disability though, is co-option and appropriation. You gain all of the ‘benefits’ of our identities and culture, but without any of the tangible negatives. You simply don’t feel them, and any issue with accesability is undertaken by choice and just as easily overcome by a temporary ‘lapse’ of the ‘disabled identity’, i.e. remembering that yes, you can hear, you can move, and there’s no way you were never not mindful of these things or had to live under the honest marginalization of living in a society that seeks to constantly remind you of the way that you’re “diminished”.
Basically, transableists reaaaally need to brush up on their gender theory (radical or otherwise) if they think gender identity and the binary are equitable, and maybe learn the first thing about disability studies before they even touch on this bullshit.
perfection ^^^
i didnt even know about this EITHER its sooo.. *shudders*
um, what the fuck
i was aware that there were people out there who pretended to have cancer but pretending to be disabled is a whole new level of WHAT ARE YOU DOING WORLD
Being Deaf In College
I feel like I have to post this since he’s my former roommate in all, but this is a very, very touching article.
“Steve!” Tony threw up his hands in frustration. Insecure was an entirely new side of Steve, and he didn’t think he liked it. “I let you dip me on the dance floor at company parties. I go to board meetings because if I don’t they phone you and you look disappointed in me. I clean out fishtanks. I willingly ride in a Pontiac! If that’s not love, I’m sorry, but it’s all I’ve got to give.”
— Secrets of a Successful Marriage, by valtyr
one of my favourite fics ;o;)/ clicky click for full view
went clubbing with Thor
Formed a team with Loki
Became the boss of the Chitauri
Well
It could be worse. I think technically that means I killed Thanos or something, so that makes me pretty much the biggest badass in the universe.
Shazari is worshipped by Loki.
Yes, please. :DWent clubbing with Captain America.
OH GOD WE’D BOTH JUST KIND OF STAND IN THE CORNER AWKWARDLY, THINKING ABOUT HOW MUCH WE’D RATHER BE DRAWING.
Creating a new world with Loki. This thing is on point.
Showered together with Black Widow. Oh yeah.
(Source: pigtailedrhapsody)
I’m going to make my own reboot of Sherlock Holmes: SHERHAWK HOLMES AND HULKSON: HULK SMASH PUNY CLUE.
They would just wander around and get confused at things and smash/blow stuff up, unless the clue is a door, and Hawkeye will have a brilliant revelation about doors opening from both sides. Black Widow will be Lestrade and she’ll just go ahead and solve the mystery for them and then make them think they did they did it so that they feel proud of themselves.
even with all the cuddling they do during their downtime, the superhusbands are still superheroes! even if they do discuss dinner plans while fighting.
poor clint
I gave up a lot for this life. I could have had a good, simple life. But I wanted to play with the big boys. And if I miss, it means I’m just another dude with a bow. It means I’ve been fooling myself this whole time. And that’s why I never miss.


